Ognjen Bošković’s Post

View profile for Ognjen Bošković, graphic

Founder of Raven 🐦⬛ | B2B's social content agency | Fractional Head of Brand & Content

Technical SEO is being oversold. Most of the time you'd be better off investing into great content or even better, building an SEO product. That's what Eli Schwartz claims in today's edition of Growth Notes. He is a growth advisor responsible for driving billions of $ in organic revenue. These are just some of the brands he worked with: - WordPressSurveyMonkeyQuoraShutterstockZendeskIBM The whole list is too long for this post. Check his profile and see for yourself. He's also the best selling author of Product-Led SEO. If you want to join the debate, or ask him anything about how product-led companies can build huge organic search moats like the ones he worked with... Now's the perfect time. Shoot all your questions/comments below.

  • No alternative text description for this image
Yair Bennett

I help companies acquire the clients they want. Founder @ Persumo - Digital Transformation Agency | Increase Revenue, Decrease Waste, & Accelerate Growth

2y

Great book.

Generic technical SEO delivered in a cookie cutter matter is definitely being oversold. By this, I mean the agencies that run one Screaming Frog Crawl, grab some Ahref data and produce a report that is essentially everything they know about SEO. Technical SEO done with a good knowledge of the customer, what they are selling and their objectives is a different matter. For one UK retailer, we doubled their revenue from search for generic terms (i.e not their brand names) from £500,000 to £1,000,000 by fixing a host of technical seo issues that was preventing Google and Bing from really indexing the site. Technical SEO works best well when it's done in conjunction with merchandising, content or even design For example, we carried out a technical seo audit for a financial services company which contained an audit of their competitors audit. The biggest change they could make was actually adding internal links from the blog content to the products or services. For other companies, we often get involved a design stage to ensure that content can actually be accessed by the search engines. We've seen clients lose 100,000's of visits a month when they didn't check how search friendly a new design was

S. Colby Phillips

Lead Content Designer at AT&T

2y

I think this premise is generally true. From my agency experience, aside from an occasional client who did something like block their entire site with a poorly executed robots.txt file, the significant wins were generated through content. I think the technical playing field has become more leveled due to 1.) Google being able to figure its way around more technical issues, and 2.) platforms that are much more technically sound out of the box in regards to SEO. On the other hand, I've seen large enterprise sites with serious technical issues caused by literally decades of technical debt, customization of the CMS to the point that it was unrecognizable, and a number of other self-inflicted problems that likely impacted the sites' technical health. These are problems not easily solved with a simple technical audit.

Ane Wiese

SEO Lead at saas.group (various brands) - Growth Focused SaaS SEO

2y

I look at SEO completely differently. It does not follow a template, but rather adjusts to what would work best for the client. Tech SEO, CRO and Content are all just SEO to me. If you take that approach you aren’t ever locked in and you get great results. I read the original post in the email, I’d only add that although you can pay a developer to do certain site updates that would be very beneficial to the website, it is still SEOs who must point out what needs to be updated. Many of my clients have developers before they had SEO and no improvements to basic things like mobile friendliness, page structure, schema etc are usually made. This is off topic, but I often feel like I test developers’ work for them.

Like
Reply
Dr Paul Marsden (CPsychol)

Chartered Psychologist specialising in consumer behaviour

2y

So true. No matter how much SEO lipstick you sell to a pig, it’s still a pig. The madness of digital silos, where (technical) SEO is separated from creating and communicating value

Greg Mischio

Helping manufacturers and b2b companies improve their web presence and generate leads. Founder and CEO of Winbound, a digital sales and marketing agency.

2y

I'll have to check out the book Eli Schwartz! We haven't seen any noticeable gains implementing technical SEO recommendations from audits, but we've seen massive increases from great content. However, where we like to use tech audits is to find out potentially why we've had a drop in traffic. A few of those have revealed issues related to EAT, or even some incorrect setups with canonical tags that may have been confusing meta crawlers. I'm thinking if you use that approach once, to make sure the site is set up correctly, and then you create a good infrastructure for the new content you post (alt image tags, link internally, meta descriptions and good title tags), then you don't need repeated audits. Thoughts on that approach Eli or anyone? Winbound

Mark Rafferty

Founder at Prevail Comms LTD - Communications

2y

There's not much technical stuff when it comes to SEO it's more content. I have founded several business based on search organic traffic. There isn't much technical stuff to do with SEO. To an advanced SEO you can semi-automate technical SEO onsite and off-site optimization comes at a price of damn good offer and products but also the copywriter.

Ari Herdianto

SEO Specialist | Onpage SEO | Offpage SEO | Link Buildings | Client Relationship

2y

I have few clients with only 3 until 7 pages in their website, and they don't want to add additional contents cause that the nature of their business in my country. So I don't know what its call "great content" by number of pages in that case, but all i know is they could get ranked after i flood their web with tons of link from hi-authority domain. Regardless if this right/wrong in technical SEO but some website owner just want to get ranked with their small website (with tiny and duplicate contents).

Like
Reply

I thought your article was well written ... in a way that most will understand. Basically, do your homework and don't get oversold that technical SEO is going to make your site better. Your site better be better before you begin. Thanks for posting. (Except ... your home analogy ... if an earthquake comes along and destroys yr home ... the curb appeal is not going to matter much LOL).

Interesting point that page speed helps on site conversion more than search. What do you think about image weight and alt tags?

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics